Monday, May 20, 2013

Facebook: Rape is fine, but NO NIPPLES!!


John Currin (B. 1962), Bea Arthur Naked, oil on canvas, painted in 1991. Estimate: $1,800,000 – $2,500,000. (John Currin/Christie's)

Today, I was notified of 2 Facebook articles that couldn't have bee more different.

Bea Arthur’s Boobs Got Us Booted From Facebook and Horrifying new trend: Posting rapes to Facebook.

Why is it that a painting of natural breasts was removed - and caused the page and 23 Admins to be BANNED but there was an actual video of a 12-year-old-girl being raped posted to Facebook for an unknown period of time?

None of the articles I read today mentioned a Facebook ban for any of the boys (aka Rapists) or anyone else who may have posted and/or shared the video of the rape. (And I will not use the word "alleged" rapists because a video of a rape is a rape, not an alleged rape.) 

Which begs the question, has anyone posting pictures or videos of an actual rape been banned from Facebook? What about the 32,000 Facebook shares of the baby "porn" [aka RAPE] video?

As I said in a previous article:

Facebook, perhaps you should reconsider your policies. You “protect” our nipples but promote the mutilation of our vaginas. Are the lives of women worth so little to you?

No comments:

Post a Comment